Note from 17 October 2022
we hope that our observations and support will help bring JPEG XL support to the web for all chrome users
— @colinbendell from Shopify
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1178058#c79
YES, please! 🙏
Related contents with similar topics
-
JPEG XL vs AVIF for web use-cases
I'll go into full detail, with examples and benchmarks, but for those of you who don't have the time, here are [2 of] the headlines: For lossy photos…
-
Standards In Progress: Making Video Posters Accessible, Responsive, and an Element
I'm showing just a sampling of the available markup here of course–you might want to coordinate multiple art-directed video and picture sources for…
-
JPEG XL isn't useless; it is genuinely compelling technology for use cases beyond the Web. I'm just not personally convinced we need it in browsers…
-
The present and potential future of progressive image rendering
So if the browser manages to download 6 kB then stalls, then AVIF can produce a better result. But since the AVIF rendering is only two-pass, if the…
-
kliksphilip
JPEG VS AVIF - The Battle of Compression
In this super thorough study I test one single HD image and come to vast sweeping conclusions about JPEG XL and AVIF. But that's still one image comparison…
Jake Archibald
Scott Jehl
Gianni Rosato
