we hope that our observations and support will help bring JPEG XL support to the web for all chrome users
— @colinbendell from Shopify
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1178058#c79
YES, please! 🙏
Seriously, do we need yet another version of Low Quality Image Placeholders?
Why do some people want to do additional work just to show useless colourful pixels to users, delaying the rendering of the actual image?
As a user, I hate LQIP. Single colour backgrounds are fine, though.
According to the results presented above, we can conclude that JXL is the superior format for both lossy and lossless operations. That is clear by…
Rob O'Leary
The next generation image format for the web is not JPEG XL?
Perhaps, the jig is not up for JPEG XL and HEIC. WebP was in Chrome for 5 years before the others decided to follow suit. The format war is a war…
TIL AVIF transformation is only available on #Cloudflare for images below 2 megapixels… 😭
https://community.cloudflare.com/t/avif-size-limit/273724/5
We need JPEG XL! 🙏
Ok, so Mozilla won't help JPEG XL…
Overall, we don't see JPEG-XL performing enough better than its closest competitors (like AVIF) to justify addition on that basis alone. — https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#issuecomment-1409539985
😭