Note from 24 May 2023

I really like to see that all browser vendors agree with @scottjehl@mstdn.social that we need @​media, srcset and sizes for <video> as for <img>/<picture>! 🤩

https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6363

• Older: Note from 24 May 2023
• Newer: Note from 31 May 2023

Related contents with similar topics

1. 

   Eric Portis

   Sizes="auto" pretty much requires width and height attributes

   • Nicolas Hoizey
   • 5 December 2023
   • image, responsive, WebPerf
   • 6 reactions

   sizes="auto" is a great new feature of HTML for lazy loaded responsive images. are we dealing with an with sizes=auto? Then its natural dimensions…

2. 

   Scott Jehl

   We're Bringing Responsive Video Back!

   • Nicolas Hoizey
   • 29 September 2023
   • video, responsive
   • 7 reactions

   Responsive videos with simple HTML and no JS! 😍 Hopefully, this patch will show up in an upcoming Firefox release! 🤞

3. 

   Jason Grigsby

   New Recommendations for Ecommerce Images

   • Nicolas Hoizey
   • 15 June 2023
   • image, responsive, WebPerf, ecommerce
   • 9 reactions

   For ecommerce companies—particularly for those selling apparel—it likely makes sense to prioritize image quality above file size. This is a really…

4. Note from 12 June 2023

   • Nicolas Hoizey
   • 12 June 2023
   • HTML, responsive, video
   • 5 reactions

   The media attribute is back into the spec for <video>'s <source>! 🥳

   https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9341

   Let's hope srcset and sizes come next, but this needs a new issue:
   https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6363#issuecomment-1564464346

5. 

   Tyler Sticka

   Is there a viable animated GIF alternative yet or what?

   • Nicolas Hoizey
   • 1 June 2023
   • WebPerf, video, GIF
   • 6 reactions

   We need to talk about video and animated image formats in the same breath. Many articles compare video formats to GIF, or image formats to each other,…