Jump to main content

Nicolas Hoizey

  • articles
  • billets
  • links
  • notes
  • talks
  • archives
  • about

Note from 31 January 2023

  • Nicolas Hoizey
  • 31 January 2023
  • Firefox, image, JPEG XL, Mozilla, performance
  • 7 reactions

Ok, so Mozilla won't help JPEG XL…

Overall, we don't see JPEG-XL performing enough better than its closest competitors (like AVIF) to justify addition on that basis alone. — https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#issuecomment-1409539985

😭

7 reactions

4 likes

  1. Elly Loel ✨🌱 avatar
  2. igorlogius avatar
  3. Shiar avatar
  4. Tobias Baldauf avatar

1 repost

  1. igorlogius avatar

2 replies

  1. igorlogius avatar igorlogius
    @nhoizey Mmmh, maybe more people need to vote on
    https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/support-jpeg-xl/idi-p/18433
    Maybe that would help.
    Support JPEG XL
    • 31 January 2023, 08:59
    • Source
  2. Shiar avatar Shiar
    @nhoizey I agree... on that basis alone.
    Completely disagree wrt "feature advancements": progressive loading, recompression, colors; any of these make alternatives not just worse but incomparable.
    • 31 January 2023, 09:39
    • Source
  • Older: Note from 27 January 2023
  • Newer: Note from 31 January 2023

Related contents with similar topics

  1. screenshot of JPEG VS AVIF - The Battle of Compression

    kliksphilip

    JPEG VS AVIF - The Battle of Compression

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 25 September 2024
    • image, WebPerf, AVIF, JPEG XL
    • 2 reactions

    In this super thorough study I test one single HD image and come to vast sweeping conclusions about JPEG XL and AVIF. But that's still one image comparison…

  2. screenshot of Why Apple Uses JPEG XL in the iPhone 16 and What it Means for Your Photos

    Jeremy Gray

    Why Apple Uses JPEG XL in the iPhone 16 and What it Means for Your Photos

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 20 September 2024
    • JPEG XL, photography, image
    • 3 reactions

    For iPhone photographers, the benefits far outweigh the potential downsides. There’s little doubt that JPEG XL is an excellent image format that offers…

  3. Note from 24 April 2024

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 24 April 2024
    • image, JPEG XL, Lighthouse, photography, WebPerf
    • 3 reactions

    Should I please Lighthouse with modern image formats, or my visitors with progressive rendering of large images in my photography site? 🤔

    screenshot of Lighthouse score in SpeedCurve, with a recommendation to use modern image formats

    Of course, this would be much easier with genaralized JPEG XL support, both modern and allowing progressive… 🤷‍♂️

  4. screenshot of JPEG XL and the Pareto Front

    Jon Sneyers

    JPEG XL and the Pareto Front

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 29 February 2024
    • JPEG XL, image, WebPerf
    • 5 reactions

    This consolidates JPEG XL’s position as the best image codec currently available, for both lossless and lossy compression, across the quality range…

  5. screenshot of JPEG XL has not been selected for Interop 2024

    the Interop team

    JPEG XL has not been selected for Interop 2024

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 2 February 2024
    • JPEG XL, browser, image, WebPerf

    Thank you for proposing JPEG XL image format for inclusion in Interop 2024. We wanted to let you know that this proposal was not selected to be part…

If you want to share an error or suggest an enhancement of this content, please edit the source on GitHub.

© Nicolas Hoizey

Built with Eleventy