https:/
According to the results presented above, we can conclude that JXL is the superior format for both lossy and lossless operations. That is clear by only looking at the results, but we can also have a look at the features of each format. Some of them are very important.
Seriously, do we need yet another version of Low Quality Image Placeholders?
Why do some people want to do additional work just to show useless colourful pixels to users, delaying the rendering of the actual image?
As a user, I hate LQIP. Single colour backgrounds are fine, though.
Rob O'Leary
The next generation image format for the web is not JPEG XL?
Perhaps, the jig is not up for JPEG XL and HEIC. WebP was in Chrome for 5 years before the others decided to follow suit. The format war is a war of attrition!
TIL AVIF transformation is only available on #Cloudflare for images below 2 megapixels… 😭
https://community.cloudflare.com/t/avif-size-limit/273724/5
We need JPEG XL! 🙏
Ok, so Mozilla won't help JPEG XL…
Overall, we don't see JPEG-XL performing enough better than its closest competitors (like AVIF) to justify addition on that basis alone. — https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#issuecomment-1409539985
😭
⚠️ Be carefull if you use SVGO or SVGOMG to optimize #SVG images using <symbol>s.
There's a bug that might remove them when it shouldn't:
https://github.com/svg/svgo/issues/1726
