Jump to main content

Nicolas Hoizey

  • articles
  • billets
  • links
  • notes
  • talks
  • archives
  • about

Note from 25 June 2020

  • Nicolas Hoizey
  • 25 June 2020
  • Dareboost, WebPerf
  • 13 reactions

Looks like #Dareboost liked improvements made yesterday evening! 💪

100 % in Dareboost on the homepage of my site

Speed Index at 800 on 3G, despite a laaate 530 ms TTFB, not bad! 🤔

Dareboost report for the homepage of my site

13 reactions

3 likes

  1. arnoSEO avatar
  2. Boris Schapira 🚀 avatar
  3. Dareboost avatar

1 repost

  1. Boris Schapira 🚀 avatar

8 replies

  1. Tim avatar Tim
    530ms seem unexpectedly long for your website, it could be a temporary glitch somewhere in the chain between dareboost and alwaysdata.
    To partly answer your original question, you might want to take a look at curl -w output format or httpstat: github.com/reorx/httpstat
    • 25 June 2020, 16:38
    • Source
  2. Nicolas Hoizey avatar Nicolas Hoizey
    This is not a temporary glitch, as @Dareboost shows, that's why I want to investigate.

    I'll see what I can get with http stat, thanks! 👍
    • 25 June 2020, 17:05
    • Source
  3. Nicolas Hoizey avatar Nicolas Hoizey
    Also, it's almost the same with Netlify, so I guess it's not an issue with @alwaysdata

    Did you see it's on simulated 3G?
    • 25 June 2020, 17:12
    • Source
  4. Boris Schapira 🚀 avatar Boris Schapira 🚀
    In Dareboost, the "More metrics" qui decompose the TTFB between DNS, Connecting, Waiting and Receiving.
    • 25 June 2020, 17:17
    • Source
  5. Boris Schapira 🚀 avatar Boris Schapira 🚀
    If your Connecting time is long, you can test with a perfect bandwidth/0ms latency to better assess the problem. If nothing changes, maybe it's because it takes time to validate your certificate.
    • 25 June 2020, 17:17
    • Source
  6. Nicolas Hoizey avatar Nicolas Hoizey
    Looks like I never clicked that button… 😅

    Connection takes 334 ms.
    • 25 June 2020, 17:28
    • Source
  7. Nicolas Hoizey avatar Nicolas Hoizey
    No issue on a perfect network:
    dareboost.com/en/report/a_35…
    • 25 June 2020, 17:30
    • Source
  8. Nicolas Hoizey avatar Nicolas Hoizey
    First result with httpstat from my computer on fiber was chocking! 🤷‍♂️

    Next ones are better.
    • 25 June 2020, 17:52
    • Source

1 mention

  1. Nicolas Hoizey avatar Nicolas Hoizey
    How do you analyse TTFB?

    How to know how many of these 530 ms come from the network, from reading files on the server, from many rules to parse in `.htaccess`, etc.?
    • 25 June 2020, 15:32
    • Source
  • Older: Note from 25 June 2020
  • Newer: Note from 1 July 2020

Related contents with similar topics

  1. Note from 24 May 2022

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 24 May 2022
    • AVIF, Cloudflare, Cloudinary, Dareboost, Netlify, WebPerf

    Why is #Dareboost reporting "7 resources has a non-consistent extension with its actual content" in this report where #Cloudinary images were proxified through #Netlify, but not on this one where they're not… 🤷‍♂️

  2. Note from 30 November 2020

    • Nicolas Hoizey
    • 30 November 2020
    • Dareboost, WebPerf
    • 2 reactions

    That's the kind of #Dareboost report I like to receive on Monday! 💪

    Finally 100/100 on Dareboost report

    That's an article page with 4 videos and 3 images.

If you want to share an error or suggest an enhancement of this content, please edit the source on GitHub.

© Nicolas Hoizey

Built with Eleventy